+91 8686144086 info@colloquys.com

Overview

Editorial policies define the principles and procedures governing the submission, evaluation, peer review, and publication of scholarly content. These policies are established to ensure fairness, consistency, academic rigor, and ethical integrity across all journals published by the organization.

Commitment to Transparency: All editorial decisions are made in accordance with these policies and are applied consistently and transparently.

Editorial Independence

Editorial independence is a fundamental principle of scholarly publishing. Editors have full authority over editorial decisions, including manuscript acceptance, revision, or rejection.

Editorial decisions are made without influence from commercial interests, sponsors, advertisers, or institutional affiliations. This independence ensures the integrity and credibility of the scholarly record.

Manuscript Handling and Initial Assessment

All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial assessment to evaluate:

  • Alignment with the journal's aims and scope - Ensuring the manuscript fits within the journal's subject area and publishing objectives
  • Compliance with submission and ethical requirements - Verifying adherence to formatting guidelines, ethical standards, and submission protocols
  • Originality, relevance, and academic quality - Assessing the novelty of the research, its contribution to the field, and scholarly rigor

Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be declined without external peer review. Decisions at this stage are documented and based on clearly defined editorial standards.

Peer Review Policy

Each journal operates a clearly defined peer-review model, which is publicly disclosed on the journal's website. Peer review is conducted by independent experts selected for their subject knowledge and absence of conflicts of interest.

Peer Review Standards

Editors are responsible for ensuring that the peer-review process is:

  • Fair and unbiased - Reviews are conducted objectively without personal, institutional, or commercial bias
  • Confidential - All manuscript content and review materials are protected throughout the process
  • Conducted in a timely manner - Reviews are completed within reasonable timeframes to ensure efficient publication
  • Focused on scholarly merit - Evaluations are based on academic quality, methodology, and contribution to the field

Editorial decisions are informed by reviewer reports and editorial judgment.

Ethical Oversight and Research Integrity

The publisher maintains established procedures for identifying, investigating, and addressing ethical concerns, including:

Plagiarism

Detection and investigation of unattributed use of text, ideas, data, or figures from other sources without proper citation.

Data Fabrication or Falsification

Investigation of suspected manipulation, fabrication, or falsification of research data, results, or images.

Redundant or Duplicate Publication

Identification of manuscripts that have been published elsewhere without appropriate disclosure or cross-referencing.

Authorship Disputes

Resolution of disputes regarding author contributions, inappropriate authorship claims, or omitted contributors.

Undisclosed Conflicts of Interest

Identification and management of conflicts of interest that may compromise research integrity or editorial objectivity.

Allegations of misconduct are handled through documented processes that ensure fairness, confidentiality, and proportional response. Where necessary, corrective actions are taken in accordance with recognized ethical guidelines.

Conflicts of Interest

Disclosure and Management

Editors, reviewers, and authors are required to disclose any conflicts of interest that could influence the editorial process. Disclosures are reviewed and managed transparently to ensure objective evaluation.

Where conflicts are identified, editorial responsibility is reassigned as appropriate.

Confidentiality

All manuscripts, reviewer reports, and editorial communications are treated as confidential. Editors and reviewers must not disclose information obtained through the editorial process or use unpublished material for personal advantage.

Ongoing Commitment: Confidentiality obligations apply throughout and beyond the editorial process.

Corrections, Retractions, and Expressions of Concern

The publisher is committed to maintaining the accuracy of the scholarly record. When errors or ethical concerns are identified after publication, appropriate actions may include:

Corrections or Corrigenda

Publication of formal corrections to address errors in published articles that do not affect the overall conclusions or validity of the research.

Retractions

Complete withdrawal of published articles when serious errors, misconduct, or ethical violations are confirmed that invalidate the findings or conclusions.

Expressions of Concern

Public statements alerting readers to potential issues with published research while investigations are ongoing or when evidence is inconclusive.

Transparent Process: Such actions are undertaken transparently, with clear documentation and in accordance with recognized publication ethics standards.

Appeals and Complaints

Independent Review Process

Authors may appeal editorial decisions or submit complaints regarding the editorial process. Appeals and complaints are reviewed through an independent reassessment process by individuals not involved in the original decision.

  • Objective Handling - All appeals and complaints are handled objectively and without bias
  • Thorough Documentation - Complete records are maintained throughout the review process
  • Timely Resolution - Appeals and complaints are resolved within reasonable timeframes

Policy Review and Updates

Continuous Improvement

Editorial policies are reviewed periodically to ensure alignment with evolving scholarly publishing standards and ethical guidelines. Current versions of all policies are made publicly available, and material updates are communicated transparently.

This ongoing review ensures that our policies remain relevant, effective, and aligned with best practices in scholarly publishing.

Alignment with Ethical Standards

International Standards Compliance

These editorial policies are aligned with internationally recognized principles of publication ethics, including guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and other leading organizations.

These policies are implemented to safeguard the integrity, transparency, and reliability of scholarly communication.